Home
rraut1
02 December 2008 @ 10:14 pm
Auto sales for November were horrible as expected. At the current sales rate,  both American and foreign auto makers will be bleeding cash at an alarming rate.  GM says it needs $4 billion this month be able to fund its operations to March of next year, another $8 billion would be needed at that point, another $6 billion would be on stand by. Democrats are talking like it is a done deal but  it is not clear they have the votes in the Senate to pass a bill and it is not clear that stll-President Bush would sign the bill. Even after they get loans from the government, they have to hope that car sales return to something like recession levels.

I don't think Chrysler is viable. The best we can hope for is that they can sell some of their stronger brands and shut down the remainder of the company cleanly. GM, because of their large dealer network, is a much stickier problem. Current state law requires GM to buy out the dealer if it can no longer provide them cars. This makes eliminating brands like Saturn very expensive. Ford is in the best shape relatively speaking. It has cash and credit lines to keep running until the end of 2009 by which time the market will have improved or one of its competitors will be out of business.

Main post

 
 
rraut1
15 October 2008 @ 11:05 pm

The combination of rising mortgage interest rates and worries about unemployment will continue to weigh on the housing market. With more price declines next year, expect more foreclosures and more losses at banks and at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Obama team should plan for another bigger bailout next year when the current bailout proves ineffective.

Technorati Tags:
 
 
rraut1
10 October 2008 @ 09:27 pm

The G-7 finance ministers met and released a statement promising coordinated global inaction to deal with the credit crisis. Fortunately, the crisis is about to play itself out soon. Credit markets will begin to reopen; stocks will stabilize. People who have been frantically doing things will take credit for the calm. Of course, the real economy is about to get much worse but it will be much less visible than the stock ticker, so politicians will get back to the more sedate bickering about which brand of snake oil to give to the patient. There are remedies that are clearly called for but we are most likely going to get all the old pet causes (unemployment insurance, capital gains tax cut) dressed up as solutions for the new illness.

 
 
rraut1
09 October 2008 @ 08:33 pm

The Treasury is considering buying preferred shares in U.S. banks in a style similar to the United Kingdom's bank plan. But don't call it partial nationalization, because that's what it is. Besides being ideologically unsound, it won't by itself fix the current crisis.

The key problem at the moment is the snarled Credit Default Swaps. Part of the problem will be resolved when the Lehman Brother CDS are settled tomorrow. But I am sure that many parties are reconsidering the risk they took on when they sold credit default swaps to companies formerly rated very secure. The government should sell credit default swaps to companies that can prove they have a net short position in CDS, but covering no more than 80% of the net short position and of course at current market prices. This could be very profitable for the government if the company the CDS covers does not go bankrupt. And it would free up more capital due to the leverage involved in the swap.

Technorati Tags:
 
 
rraut1
07 October 2008 @ 10:36 pm

It is times like this that you appreciate the fractional reserve banking system in the electronic age. If the U.S. was on the gold (or other hard money) standard, then the current crisis would have been much worse. Some argue that there would be no crisis if we were on a hard money standard, but that argument overlooks the evidence  from history. The U.S. was on the silver standard during the 1929 crash and the 1932 banking crisis; England was on the gold standard duiring the South Sea bubble, etc. Bubbles occur because  people emulate the behavior of the people arround them.

Now that we are in a panic, Money Velocity (the average number of hands a unit of money passes through in a given period) is  dropping. This requires the money supply to expand enormously in order to support the same level of economic activity. Fortunately, a computerized banking system means the Federal Reserve can create unbelievable amounts of money. But so far it has only been willing to do so much.

The Commercial Paper Funding Facility is a big step forward that should allow companies to meet their short term funding needs until banks and markets return to their more normal in providing credit to the real economy.

Technorati Tags:
 
 
rraut1
04 October 2008 @ 11:03 pm
Brad Setser is right. The dollar is a funding currency that is de-leveraging. How long this goes on and where we will be afterwords is unknown. If the credit crunch bites into trade financing, then countries that are dependent on exports (you know who you are) are going to have a very rough time. A credit related disruption of trade could have the same effect as Smoot-Hawley.
 
 
rraut1
03 October 2008 @ 11:13 pm
California is beginning to feel the effects of the grow credit crunch. While not a model state government, California still has a good credit rating. But as investors head for the hills, even safe investments are being spurned. The recently approved rescue plan will probably not have an immediate effect on the market. Per Brad Setser, the Fed is now providing about $1.25 trillion in liquidity support to the global financial system. Yet even this amount is not enough to return markets to a functioning state. Short term credit has disappeared. The only question is when a major corporation will have to make cuts in investment and payroll due to a lack of access to credit.
 
 
rraut1
02 October 2008 @ 08:40 pm
McCain pulling out of Michigan. Unless Obama has a heart attack before the election, there is no way for McCain to get a majority in the electoral college without winning Michigan. It was always going to be up hill for McCain but the disastrous choice of Sarah Palin as VP and the credit crisis have put this election out of reach already.
 
 
rraut1
01 October 2008 @ 09:14 pm
Is Georgia ready for a black governor? The state is already facing the prospect of a black president. I didn't this would be more than an academic question until I saw this poll result
<br /> State   Democrat 	D-pct Republican  	R-pct  	Start  	 End  	 Pollster<br />Georgia Jim Martin 	44%   Saxby Chambliss* 	46% 	Sep 28 	Sep 29 	SurveyUSA<br />

The idea of a democrat defeating Chamblis given the edge in money that the incumbent has seems preposterous in a heavily Republican leaning state. But if you're sitting in a line at an Atlanta gas station hoping to get enough gas to go to work, you might think "This country is going in the wrong direction." You might even be angry enough to vote against the incumbent. If the Democrats can win a state-wide election for Senate, then they may be able to repeat that in a state wide race for governor.

Vernon Jones, who came in second in the Democratic primary, might be in the race for the nomination in two years. Or more intriguing, Labor Commissioner Michael Thurmond may run and he has already won some state-wide races, having been re-elected as Labor Commissioner several times.

 
 
rraut1
30 September 2008 @ 07:27 pm

It is an article of faith for economists that government can and should prevent economic crisis. It has to be an article of faith because there is no evidence that the belief is true. While it is known that governments can destroy a flourishing economy, the process of restarting a stalled economy is shrouded in superstition and conjecture. A gardener may plow, feed and fertilize but it is up to the seed to sprout. Sometimes it does without any care and sometime it doesn't despite great efforts.

Prosperity is build on a web of relationships. Businesses learn to trust their suppliers as they convince their customer to trust them. Banks trust their borrowers and become trusted by savers. Government can encourage and reinforce these relationships, but when an event comes along to bat away this trust as a man might treat a cobweb, then there is little government can do. No laws can compel co-operation; no amount of money can replace that willing suspension of disbelief that is at the heart of all economic bubbles.

Government, at times like these, must learn to be humble. Better to promise little and deliver than to paint utopia and add to the disillusionment. When government begin to rebuild trust, they must first regain the trust of the governed. The vote in the House shows that we are currently far from that ideal.

 
 
rraut1
29 September 2008 @ 11:51 pm

But a good day for democracy. Republicans have finally left behind the insane Bush borrow and spend era. The Paulson price tag failed for the simple reason that the Bush administration couldn't explain how it would help the situation to even financially literate people, much less to the general public and the financially illiterate Congress.

The situation is serious but it requires considered action rather than shotgun scatter shots of money. Unfortunately, we will have to wait for the next administration before anything like progress can occur and I expect the first attempts will be off the mark. More than a trillion dollars of market capitialization was lost today. But it's only money.

There will be panic. People will loses jobs. But America will survive.

 
 
rraut1
28 September 2008 @ 08:44 am

Bail out is the term that gets thrown around but it is a very unsatisfactory term to use.

In Bear Sterns, the bond holders were bailed-out but the stock holders were wiped out.

For Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Washington Mutual, the Bush Doctrine comes to the financial system. All three were seized before they were insolvent. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac senior and subordinated debt was made whole but preferred and common stockholder where left hanging.
Only depositors were protected in the Washington Mutual case.

And for Lehman Brothers, nobody was protected.

The problem for the financial markets is that no one knows the rules. No one knows what a safe investment. Money markets were thought safe but the Lehman bankruptcy proved that idea wrong.

$700 billion may or may not help. What the markets need is certainty about how the government will behave. It is unlikely to get it while politicians and bureaucrats are rushing around making an exception here, banning short selling here, and throwing in the occasional game of chicken between different parts of the government.

 
 
rraut1
27 September 2008 @ 11:22 pm
Will they or won't they? The House Republicans have climbed out on a limb by opposing the Paulson --well whatever it is. Can they really come up with wording that will finesse the deep philosophical objections the conservatives have and still keep the essence of the original plan. I am skeptical. The House Republicans have already indicated that they are willing to take the blame/credit for no action being taken. If nothing passes and banking system doesn't crumble, then they will be heros -- in their own eyes, at least.
The truth is that the drama in Washington is a side show. None of the proposals for action will slow the deleveraging that is occuring around the world. A bailout bill would provide a short term boost to morale, but like the stimulas package before it, will only delay the pain. There will be some relief in the money markets once the end of the quarter passes. The next big shock will the Friday Non-farm payroll report and the Employment survey. The later could be as high as 6.4%. And the effects of the credit crunch overseas are intensifying; Fortis and Bradford & Bingley are on the verge of collapse.
 
 
rraut1
26 September 2008 @ 06:33 am
Headline:
Republicans to Wall Street: Drop Dead!
 
 
rraut1
25 September 2008 @ 08:45 pm
Bailout: Done. Bailout:Dead? Congressional Republicans may be balking at the deal negotiated by their leaders in the face of tremendous outrage by their constituents, not to mentions polls show that the public is blaming them for the crisis. W, who is not up for re-election, tried to convince his party to swallow the hemlock but found his persuasion limited by the fact that he had announced the economy very strong just a couple of weeks ago.
 
 
rraut1
24 September 2008 @ 11:26 pm
What if they had a presidential debate and one of the candidates didn't show up? Would they give the entire time to the candidate that boldly assumed that the people who were currently running country were competent enough to handle the problem? Would they invite a minor party candidate such as Bob Barr to fill in for the missing debater? Would McCain show up at the Vice Presidential debate and take on Joe Biden? Will Palin ever be ready to debate anyone?
 
 
rraut1
23 September 2008 @ 11:53 pm

The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Oh, wait. It's just raining. But give us the money anyway, we might need it to leave the country and buy a refuge on a tropical island where the population does not question its leaders.

The problem is serious but Congress should not just give a ton of money to the Treasury department with out an explanation of how it will be used. I think that Bershire Hathaway's investment in Goldman Saks shows that markets still work without nationalizing the banking system.

Technorati Tags:
 
 
rraut1
21 September 2008 @ 12:45 pm
I expect volume on the stock market to be low for the next two weeks. Why play the game when they are still deciding on the rules? Until the bailout bill has been passed and signed, and the rules for short selling has been revert to permenant, stock buyers are likely to stay on strike. Those people who have to sell stocks will not get very good prices because the liquidity is out of the market. Any declines will probably be mild because sellers will pull back from the market in case the new rules give them a stronger hand. Closing down the exchanges for a week would spread the panic. Instead they will be open for non-business.
 
 
Current Mood: bored
 
 
rraut1
20 September 2008 @ 12:09 pm

I do not usually interfere with a medic while he is in the middle of saving a patient but I would like to point out one flaw in the mega-bailout plan
that is being presented to congress. Before you give a transfusion, you should stop the bleeding. Buying bad mortgages may help for now, but in six months there will be more bad mortgages, and in a year there will be even more bad mortgages. Nothing in the plan will prevent more and more people from being foreclosed on which will only drive house prices lower resulting in more foreclosures.

This plan is a bailout for financial firms without helping the real economy that those firms depend on. And because of the large debt the U.S. government is taking on the risk of inflation becoming embedded will increase. Wall Street is looking to Washington for leadership but instead it is getting the same sort of financial engineering that got us in this mess in the first place.

 
 
rraut1
14 September 2008 @ 01:38 pm

Lehman Brothers investment bank faces liquidation after emergency talks could not put together a deal to sell the investment bank to either Bank of America or Barclay's Bank. The big sticking point what the large commercial real estate portfolio which could include some significant losses. With the U.S. Treasury unwilling to use taxpayers money to assist the purchase, no one wanted to provide the capital to backstop the real estate portfolio.

This may result in a large drop in the equity markets once they reopen. No one knows what the consequences of a liquidation on this scale. Be prepared for a surprise rate cut this week to try to restore order to the market. Where the equity markets will be after such a whipsaw is anybody's guess but in the medium term it will go lower.

 
 
Current Mood: calm